Review, evaluation, or adjudication plays a fundamental role in academic publishing. Peer review helps validate research, establish a method by which it can be assessed, and increase the opportunities for networking within research communities.

All articles will be processed using a double-blind system:
Once the author uploads the article, the editor will subject it to a general review to ensure it meets the minimum requirements for processing.
The general editor will assign a section editor to continue the process.
Articles submitted for review must appear without the name of the author, title, company, or institution from which they originate. This begins the double-blind peer review process that ensures impartiality and objectivity throughout the publication process.
Both the reviewer and the author are anonymous.
Reviewers will be chosen from the journal's database or from external specialists from the journal's database for this process. They will receive a review form to guide them through the evaluation process.
The reviewers will not have contact with each other; their work is primarily coordinated by the section editors and the editor-in-chief.
The reviewers will always receive a certificate confirming their participation as reviewers with Mundo Financiero.
Once the evaluation is completed, the reviewers must issue a judgment within the following categories: PUBLISHABLE, NOT PUBLISHABLE, PUBLISHABLE WITH ARRANGEMENTS.
The section editor will receive the reviewers' verdicts and, if necessary, may seek another opinion. The procedure described above will be followed.
The section editor will be responsible for sending the author the final decision on their collaboration, detailing the reasons for their decision.
If the article is publishable with arrangements, the reviewers' suggestions for the article will be sent to the author. If the author accepts the suggestions, they must return the corrected article within the allotted timeframe.
The author's new version is compared with the original, and the editing process begins.
The review process takes four to eight weeks. In specific cases, this process may take longer due to the topic and scope of the collaboration.